×

What Is the Difference between an Anticompetitive Agreement and a Concerted Practice

Uncategorized

What Is the Difference between an Anticompetitive Agreement and a Concerted Practice

In the world of business and competition law, agreements between companies can either be anticompetitive or a concerted practice. While both of these types of agreements can be detrimental to fair competition, there are some key differences between them.

An anticompetitive agreement is an agreement made between two or more companies which aims to restrict or limit competition. This kind of agreement can take various forms, such as price-fixing or market-sharing. Price-fixing is when companies agree to set a minimum or maximum price for a particular product or service. Market-sharing, on the other hand, involves companies dividing up markets among themselves to avoid competing with each other.

Anticompetitive agreements are clearly harmful to competition, as they reduce the number of players in the market and limit consumer choice. Such practices are often illegal and can result in hefty fines for the companies involved.

A concerted practice, on the other hand, is a less explicit form of agreement between companies. It involves a certain level of cooperation between companies, but without any formal or written agreement. Examples of concerted practices include sharing sensitive information such as pricing strategies or coordinating production schedules.

While concerted practices are not as overtly harmful as anticompetitive agreements, they can still have a negative impact on competition if they lead to a reduction in the number of companies operating in a particular market. Concerted practices may also be deemed illegal if they are found to have anti-competitive effects.

It is important to note that both anticompetitive agreements and concerted practices are illegal under competition law. The key difference between the two lies in the level of explicitness in the agreement involved. Anticompetitive agreements are more explicit and formal, while concerted practices involve a certain level of cooperation between companies without any formal agreement.

In conclusion, anticompetitive agreements and concerted practices are two forms of cooperation between companies that can have negative impacts on competition. Companies must be careful to avoid engaging in such practices if they want to remain compliant with competition law and ensure fair competition for all.

Author